Worry over bully breeds, bad dogs is overblown, experts say
By Sarah Newman
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Saturday, Nov. 04 2006
Even though dogs have never been more a part of our lives than they
are today . . . even though nearly 45 million American homes have at
least one canine family member . . . dogs are being forced out of
their homes, out of entire communities, in fact, in ever-increasing
numbers.
Headlines suggest that the problem is a rash of attacks by dangerous
dogs. But speakers at a recent "Dangerous Dog Summit" sponsored by
Best Friends Animal Society contend that the headlines fail to tell
the whole story.
About 100 people — including shelter managers, breeders, animal-
control officers, dog trainers and other animal volunteers and
professionals — attended the three-day summit, which was held last
weekend in Lakeland, Colo., just outside of Denver. Denver has one of
the toughest pit bull bans in the country. Some 2,000 pit bulls were
put to death there last year because of it. Around the country,
banning pit bulls has become the popular answer to the dangerous-dog
question. Local municipalities that have jumped on the ban wagon
include Florissant, Ferguson, University City and Shrewsbury, which
has pulled the welcome mat out from under Rottweilers as well.
Rottweilers are ranked second to pit bulls for their involvement in
fatal dog attacks, according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. Little wonder that they've been singled out for special
rules and regulations.
But let's not forget German shepherds, which also are high on the
fatal-bite list. Also add Doberman pinschers, akitas, chows, Belgian
malinois, Alaskan malamutes, Siberian huskies, Irish wolfhounds,
Great Danes and Shar Peis, all of which are among the 26 breeds
banned or regulated under current laws.
The number of breeds already deemed dangerous should be enough to
make any dog owner dizzy. But the proliferation of breed-specific
legislation that sparked the Dangerous Dog Summit also includes bans
on any mixes thereof. And on any dogs of a certain size.
In Fairfield, Iowa, for example, any dog over 100 pounds is subject
to regulations. By definition alone, that would include such breeds
as the borzoi, the Great Pyrenees, the Newfoundland and the St.
Bernard.
Some dogs that have caused serious injury have managed to escape the
bans — for now.
Last year, there were 26 human fatalities, according to summit
speaker James W. Crosby, a dog-bite and dangerous-dog investigator
from Jacksonville, Fla.
It's unclear how many serious bite injuries dogs inflict each year,
but estimates based on the last major study of cases treated in
hospital emergency rooms puts the number at around 334,000.
Children under 10, the main victims of dog bites, are two times more
likely to drown in a five-gallon bucket — and 1 ½ times more likely
to die from injuries caused by playground equipment — than they are
to die from a dog attack, said Crosby, a professional dog trainer and
former police lieutenant.
Some figures from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
also may help put the dog-bite situation into perspective: Between
1997 and 2002 in Colorado, one child was killed by a dog. Between
1997 and 2002 in the United States, one child was killed in an
alcohol-related motor-vehicle accident every day.
Crosby has no doubt that we've got a dangerous-dog problem. He just
believes that there's "a certain amount of hysteria involved" in it.
There's also a consistent pattern of abuse and neglect. Twenty-five
percent of dogs involved in fatal attacks are chained or otherwise
confined. Others are poorly trained, poorly handled guard dogs. Or
macho status symbols for young gangbangers. Some are victims of
domestic violence. Most are intact males.
Breed bans are an emotional response to unfortunate incidents, Jane
Berkey of the Animal Farm Foundation (www.animalfarmfoundation.org)
in Bangall, N.Y., said. "They're a response to fear, not to facts."
Some things to think about:
— All dogs bite, and all can cause serious injuries. No scientific
studies have proven that one breed bites more than any other. The
most dangerous dog that Best Friends ever had at its large, no-kill
sanctuary, in Kanab, Utah, was a dachshund mix named Brownie,
according to the organization's president, Michael Mountain.
— Existing animal-control laws aren't properly enforced. If they
were, many of the problems related to dangerous dogs — chained dogs,
dogs running loose — would be lessened.
— When breeds are banned, irresponsible owners will continue to
ignore the laws, or turn to other breeds, re-creating the problem.
Crosby noted that pit bull breeds have been banned in his county in
Florida since 1989, yet the number of complaints and bite incidences
has not decreased.
— Shelter systems and animal-control may not be able to handle all
the surplus animals.
— Breed identification is a problem. Laura Allen, a lawyer with Best
Friends, notes that the term "pit bull terrier" can include "a
Staffordshire bull terrier, American pit bull terrier or American
Staffordshire terrier" or any mix of those breeds. Studies have shown
that animal-control officers cannot identify "pit bull terriers"
beyond a reasonable doubt. Until just recently in Toledo, Allen said,
a dog that did not look like a pit bull, even if it was 50 percent
pit bull, was not considered a pit bull. But if a dog looked like a
pit, it was considered a pit, no matter what the percentage of the
breed.
"One thing that always stands out to me about dogs throughout history
is that they are an entirely responsive species," Mountain said. "We
can breed them and train them to be any way we want them to be. All
they want to do is please us. If we want them to herd, they'll do it.
If we want them to just cozy up with us on the sofa, they'll do that.
So if we ask them to become aggressive and violent, either
intentionally or through irresponsibility, they will."
The dogs aren't the bad guys here, Mountain said, echoing the theme
that kept re-surfacing at summit gatherings. People are. The dogs are
the victims, not just of irresponsible breeders and owners but of the
violence that pervades our whole society.
On one level the Dangerous Dog Summit was about restoring the family
image of the bully breeds. About objecting to the breed-specific laws
that threaten to deprive dog owners of their companion animals. About
turning pet owners and breeders into responsible animal guardians.
But at a deeper level, Mountain said, it's about ending the cycle of
violence by starting a revolution of kindness.
"Kindness to animals, kindness to each other," Mountain said. "It's
that simple. But it will make the world a better place for all of us."
FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE DANGEROUS DOG SUMMIT AND THE BEST
FRIENDS NETWORK, LOG ON TO: WWW.NETWORK.BESTFRIENDS.ORG
snewman@post-dispatch.com | 314-340-8264
Posted on SHARE Yahoo group 11/4/06
For info, please visit http://tinyurl.com/yfdnza